首页> 外文OA文献 >Tourist choice processing : evaluating decision rules and methods of their measurement
【2h】

Tourist choice processing : evaluating decision rules and methods of their measurement

机译:游客选择处理:评估决策规则及其度量方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A detailed understanding of decision rules is essential in order to better explain consumption behavior, yet the variety of decision rules used have been somewhat neglected in tourism research. This study adopts an innovative method, greedoid analysis, to estimate a noncompensatory type of decision rule known as lexicographic by aspect (LBA). It is quite different from the weighted additive (WADD) model commonly assumed in tourism studies. By utilizing an experimental research design, this study enables the evaluation of the two types of decision rules regarding their predictive and explanatory power. Additionally, we introduce a novel evaluation indicator (cost), which allows further investigation of the heterogeneity in the use of decision rules. The results suggest that although the out-of-sample accuracy is lower, the LBA model has a better explanatory performance on respondents' preference order. Moreover, the different perspective provided by the LBA model is useful for obtaining managerial implications.
机译:为了更好地解释消费行为,对决策规则的详细理解是必不可少的,但是在旅游业研究中,所使用的各种决策规则已被忽略。这项研究采用了一种创新的方法,即贪婪分析,以估计一种非补偿类型的决策规则,称为按词法词典(LBA)。它与旅游研究中通常采用的加权加性(WADD)模型有很大不同。通过利用实验研究设计,这项研究可以评估两种决策规则的预测能力和解释能力。此外,我们引入了一种新颖的评估指标(成本),该指标可以进一步研究使用决策规则的异质性。结果表明,尽管样本外准确性较低,但LBA模型对受访者的偏好顺序具有更好的解释性能。此外,由LBA模型提供的不同视角对于获得管理含义很有用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li, CX; McCabe, S; Song, HY;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号